When your interface changes, some of the scenarios fix themselves. For the rest, you make a one-time correction, and that correction is applied everywhere the block is used. This is the reason why most in-house automation efforts fail.
AI-powered self-healing Reusable blocks Hosting in the EU
No one pays attention to maintenance when an automation project gets underway. Yet that’s where it dies. A scenario that breaks with every interface update eventually gets disabled until it can be fixed—then a second one, then ten. Test coverage quietly collapses, and the dashboard stays green because only the easy tests remain.
When it breaks
A scenario pops up on a Tuesday morning. Here are the five screens you'll go through, in order, until it turns green again.
1
The script clearly shows which step failed and the exact message returned by the engine. The log shows how long this has been going on, how often it occurs, and which of these runs triggered an incident. No one needs to replay the process to know what we’re talking about.
2
A raw failure tells us nothing. The incident, on the other hand, carries its own cause and severity level, and it has been classified as either a true positive or a false positive. It counts its occurrences rather than piling them up; it knows which scenarios it affects; and it does not reopen four times for the same reason.
3
That’s self-healing. The AI analyzes the error, the affected block, its parameters, and the page context, then suggests corrections ranked by priority and effort. Each suggestion specifies which block to insert or replace, and with which parameter. You review them, apply the changes, or discard them.
4
Suricapture replays the scenario on your machine, step by step, in a real browser. You see the failure happen instead of inferring it from a log, and you can take control of the step that’s causing the problem. Before opening any incidents, the platform automatically replays technical failures on its own.
5
Logging in, accepting cookies, selecting a location: these steps recur in almost all of your user journeys. They’re contained within a single metablock. When the interface changes, you update the metablock, and all the scenarios that call it are automatically brought back up and running together.
Before we started using Mr Suricate tools, it took us an entire day to retest all the site’s features after a new version was released. Now, it only takes 10 minutes. In just 10 minutes, using about 40 critical test scenarios in pre-production, we know whether everything is OK or not. For us, that’s the best selling point: the time savings.
Michael AlimiDOSI, Intersport
GO FURTHER
Every component of the platform, from scenario creation to verification of its execution.
Is there a term you don't understand? The automated testing glossary defines it.
YOUR QUESTIONS
Self-healing, reusable blocks, load balancing: answers to the most frequently asked questions.
When an element in your interface changes its identifier or position, the platform identifies it based on other signals and suggests a correction, rather than displaying an error. As a result, some selector mismatches are resolved without human intervention.
The scenario is logged as an incident, with the failed step and a screenshot of what the user would have seen. You fix the block once, and the fix is applied everywhere that block is used.
You're in charge. The platform doesn't replace your QA team—it enhances it. Our teams can handle all or part of the scope, and this division of labor isn't set in stone.
An action that is repeated across multiple scenarios—such as user login or checkout—becomes a single shared block. When modified once, it updates all scenarios that use it.
Self-healing isn't a substitute for a redesign. It's a matter of recovering from scenarios, and it's one of the most common reasons people turn to our teams.
A 30-minute demo of your own app. You'll see a scenario take shape, break down, and then be fixed.