Diagnosis within 3 weeksActionable deliverablesWithout changing your tools
Your tests are running. No one really knows what they cover—or how much it costs for what they don't cover. The QA audit quantifies both and produces a prioritized action plan.
Test suites are getting larger, and so is the time spent maintaining them. Meanwhile, no one knows what percentage of the user flows that generate revenue are actually being tested, or how much it costs to run unstable tests that have to be rerun three times a day.
The audit answers these two questions with numbers, not with gut feelings. It doesn't judge your team; it gives them the information they need to make decisions.
We start with the processes that drive your revenue, not your technical architecture. Each one is described, weighted, and linked to an identified business risk.
What your tests are really checking, route by route. Blind spots are clearly identified, along with the risks they pose in the event of a breakdown.
Unstable tests, duplicates, disabled scenarios, maintenance windows. Technical debt is estimated in days and in terms of risk, not described using adjectives.
A QA backlog sorted by impact and effort. You know what to automate first, what to fix, and what to stop running.
GO FURTHER
From one-time audits to ongoing monitoring and governance: what you can entrust to us.
Is there a term you don't understand? The automated testing glossary defines it.
YOUR QUESTIONS
The most common questions we're asked before launching an audit.
Typically three weeks: one week for data collection and interviews, one week for analysis, and one week for reporting and prioritization. The timeline depends mainly on the availability of your teams, not on the volume of existing tests.
No. The audit focuses on your testing setup as-is, regardless of the tools you use: in-house scripts, Cypress, Selenium, Playwright, manual testing, or a combination of these. The action plan remains valid even if you don't make any other changes afterward.
Read-only access to your test suites and execution reports, a list of your business processes, and two to three interviews with the people who ensure quality on a daily basis.
No. Mr Suricate replace your QA team—he strengthens it. The audit produces a plan that your team carries out, and more often than not, it quantifies what your team already knew but couldn't prove.
An audit report, a map of critical paths and their coverage, an estimate of QA backlog in days, and a prioritized improvement backlog. All of this will be presented during a meeting to both your teams and your management.
A one-hour discussion is all it takes to define the scope and determine whether an audit is warranted for your organization.